Nick's .NET Travels

Continually looking for the yellow brick road so I can catch me a wizard....

Fixing Back Behaviour and Navigation Button in Xamarin Forms with BuildIt.Lifecycle

There were two issues that I identified in my post, Using BuildIt.Lifecycle with Xamarin Forms, which were to do with the navigation between pages

1. The back operation actually did a forward navigation to a new page

2. The navigation button was always showing that there was a previous page, even if there wasn’t

The first issue was fixed with an update to the BuildIt.Lifecycle.XForms library which picks up on the IsNewState flag during state transition to determine whether to do a forward navigation (ie a PushAsync) or a backward navigation (ie a PopAsync).

The second issue was fixed by looking at the Navigation.NavigationStack and based on whether there were any entries in there, toggle whether the navigation bar is shown. The following would hide the navigation bar (it’s a static method on the NavigationPage class).

NavigationPage.SetHasNavigationBar(NavigationRoot, false);

Visual States in XForms with BuildIt.Lifecycle

When I created the layout for the AboutPage in my post, Using BuildIt.Lifecycle with Xamarin Forms, I cut out most of the elements to make it quicker to get something up and running. The irony is that fixing up the AboutPage to include a SplitView like pane was actually relatively quick, although there’s a bit of polish that needs to be added to make it look great. The following is the XAML for the AboutPage which includes two columns: the left column, initially hidden, includes the Close button which allows the user to navigate back to the home page of the app; the right column holds a couple of buttons that can switch states of the page between Expanded and Minimised. Note that there is another button that sits in the top left corner which will simply toggle between the states.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ContentPage xmlns="
http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             x:Class="SimpleStates.XForms.Pages.AboutPage">
  <Grid>
    <Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
      <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>
      <ColumnDefinition/>
    </Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
    <Grid BackgroundColor="Yellow"
          x:Name="SplitPane"
          IsVisible="False">

      <Button Clicked="CloseClick"
              VerticalOptions="Center"
              HorizontalOptions="Center"
              Text="Close"/>
    </Grid>

    <StackLayout Grid.Column="1"
                 VerticalOptions="Center"
                 HorizontalOptions="Center" >
      <Label  Text="About Page"
              FontSize="40" />
      <Label  Text="{Binding AboutTitle}"
              FontSize="40" />
      <Label  Text="{Binding Data}"
              FontSize="40" />
      <Button Clicked="ExpandClick" Text="Expand"/>
      <Button Clicked="CollapseClick" Text="Collapse"/>
    </StackLayout>
    <Button
      Clicked="splitViewToggle_Click"
      Text="="
      HorizontalOptions="Start"
      VerticalOptions="Start"/>
  </Grid>
</ContentPage>

Unfortunately the XForms XAML doesn’t support defining visual states, so we have to define these in code using the StateManager class. By specifying the IHasStates interface, the framework will automatically associate the StateManager on the AboutPage with the StateManager in the AboutViewModel, keeping them in sync.

public partial class AboutPage : IHasStates
{
    public IStateManager StateManager { get; }
   
    public AboutPage()
    {
        InitializeComponent();

        StateManager = new StateManager();
        StateManager
            .Group<AboutExpandStates>()
                .DefineState(AboutExpandStates.Minimised)
                .DefineState(AboutExpandStates.Expanded)
                    .Target(SplitPane)
                        .Change(x => x.IsVisible, (x, c) => x.IsVisible = c)
                        .ToValue(true);
    }

Using BuildIt.Lifecycle with Xamarin Forms

Leaving the Universal Windows Platform behind for a little bit I wanted to show that the BuildIt.Lifecycle framework can be used to drive a Xamarin Forms (XForms) application.

The first step is to create a Xamarin Forms project. In this case I’ll select the Portable option.

image

This will actually create four projects, one which is contains the actually application logic, including the XAML markup for the pages, and then three platform specific projects for iOS, Droid and Windows Phone. The platform specific projects are where any code required for device integration or custom UX goes for each platform.

After creating the projects, the first thing to do is to upgrade the Xamarin.Forms NuGet reference to the latest version (v2.0.1.6495 at time of writing).

The next thing to do is to add references to the BuildIt.Lifecycle NuGet packages including the Xamarin Forms specific package (https://www.nuget.org/packages/BuildIt.Lifecycle.XForms ). I had a few issues here because I initially had the dependency setting in the NuGet manager set to Lowest and it refused to install one of the dependencies (NuGet still isn’t clever enough some times to resolve everything properly). Switching this to Highest, which I think should be the default, fixed this issue.

Of course, the core XForms project needs a reference to the SimpleStates.Core library which contains all my application, region and view model classes. At this point I realised I hadn’t set the PCL profile correctly on the project. Updating this turned out to be a bit of a mission as Visual Studio insisted the project had to be switched to NuGet v3, which you can’t do with any packages installed (according to the error message). So I had to uninstall all the NuGet packages (in the correct order) one at a time, and then update the targets as per the Change Targets dialog for the project.

image

Now that the projects have all the references I need, it’s time to wire up the application. To do this I need to initialise the BuildIt.Lifecycle application, and I need a XForms page that maps to each of the pages (ie my states) in the application. Creating the pages is the easiest thing as they all come straight from the Forms Xaml Page template (no changing of base page required!!).

image

The image shows me creating the MainPage but I also added a SettingsPage, AboutPage and LandingPage into the Pages folder in my XForms PCL project.

Hooking up the BuildIt.Lifecycle framework was also relatively easy. In the App.cs, I simply replace the in-code page that’s created when you create the new project with the following:

public class App : Application
{
    public App()
    {
        LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<MainPage>().ForState(AppStates.Home);
        LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<SettingsPage>().ForState(AppStates.Settings);
        LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<AboutPage>().ForState(AppStates.About);

        LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<LandingPage>().ForState(AdditionalStates.Landing);

        MainPage = new NavigationPage();
        StartApplication();
    }

    private async void StartApplication()
    {
        var core = new SimpleStatesApplication();
        var wm = new WindowManager(MainPage as NavigationPage, core);
        await core.Startup(builder =>
        {
            builder.RegisterType<FormsDataService>().As<IDataService>();
        });
    }
}

This also requires an implementation of IDataService which I called FormsDataService and returns slightly different Contacts than the UWP version did, just to prove the point.

public class FormsDataService : IDataService
{
    public async Task<IEnumerable<string>> LoadContacts()
    {
        return new[] { "XF: Joe", "XF: Bob", "XF: Frank" };
    }
}

My application will now run and display the MainPage but won’t show any content. To fix this I simply needed to go through each of the pages, translate the UWP XAML into XForms and then wire up any event handlers in the code-behind (which route through to the ViewModel anyhow). The XAML and code behind (where required) for the four pages is at the end of this post…. You’ll note that I cheated on the About page just to get something displaying (I’ll come back to that to implement visual states etc) and that neither the About, nor the Landing page currently have any code behind.

That’s it – I can run the application and my page transitions work without me having to do anything. This is very much in early stages as you’ll see that the back navigation isn’t working properly (it’s actually a forward navigation at the moment) and the navigation back button exists even on the first page of the application, which isn’t correct. In coming posts we’ll clear these issues up.

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ContentPage xmlns="
http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             x:Class="SimpleStates.XForms.Pages.MainPage">
  <Grid>
    <Grid.RowDefinitions>
      <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
      <RowDefinition/>
    </Grid.RowDefinitions>
    <StackLayout >
      <Label Text="Main Page"
                  
                 FontSize="40" />
      <Button Clicked="SettingsClick">Settings</Button>
      <Button Clicked="AboutClick">About</Button>
      <Button Clicked="AnotherWindowClick">Another Window</Button>
    </StackLayout>
    <ListView Grid.Row="1" ItemsSource="{Binding Contacts}"></ListView>
  </Grid>
</ContentPage>

public partial class MainPage
{
    public MainPage()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
    }
    private MainViewModel ViewModel => BindingContext as MainViewModel;
    private void SettingsClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        ViewModel.DisplaySettings();
    }

    private void AboutClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        ViewModel.DisplayAbout();
    }
    private void AnotherWindowClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        ViewModel.OpenAnotherWindow();
    }
}

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ContentPage xmlns="
http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             x:Class="SimpleStates.XForms.Pages.SettingsPage">

  <StackLayout VerticalOptions="Center" HorizontalOptions="Center">
    <Label Text="Settings Page"
               FontSize="40" />
    <Label Text="{Binding SettingsTitle}"
               FontSize="40" />
    <Button Clicked="GoBackClick">Go Back</Button>
  </StackLayout>
</ContentPage>

public partial class SettingsPage
{
    public SettingsPage()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
    }
    private void GoBackClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        (BindingContext as SettingsViewModel)?.CompleteSettings();
    }
}

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ContentPage xmlns="
http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             x:Class="SimpleStates.XForms.Pages.AboutPage">
  <StackLayout VerticalOptions="Center" HorizontalOptions="Center" >
    <Label  Text="About Page"
                   FontSize="40" />
    <Label  Text="{Binding AboutTitle}"
             FontSize="40" />
    <Label  Text="{Binding Data}"
             FontSize="40" />
  </StackLayout>
</ContentPage>

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ContentPage xmlns="
http://xamarin.com/schemas/2014/forms"
             xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2009/xaml"
             x:Class="SimpleStates.XForms.Pages.LandingPage">
  <Label Text="Landing" VerticalOptions="Center" HorizontalOptions="Center" FontSize="40" />
</ContentPage>

Windows Hello (Beta) on Lumia 950 XL

Yesterday, after my Lumia 950 XL arrived, I noted that one of the two features I was going to try was Windows Hello. I want to start by saying that I now have this on both my Surface Book and the Lumia 950XL, and I’ve been using it on the former for quite some time now. Windows Hello on the Surface Book absolutely rocks – it’s not as instant sign on as say the Touch ID sign in capability on the iphone, which is virtually instantaneous on the latest iphones/ipads, but it is still relatively quick and definitely hands free. The latter is useful if you don’t have the keyboard attached.

Unfortunately my experience on the Lumia 950 XL has been disappointing at best, frustrating in some cases. I’ve gone in and repeatedly try to improve recognition but despite this Windows Hello only recognises me less than 50% of the time. What’s worse is that after not recognising me a couple of times it stops trying and forces me to use PIN to unlock. It would be good if it would prompt and suggest PIN to unlock, followed by perhaps a suggestion to improve recognition (perhaps to allow for different lighting conditions etc) but this should only be a suggestion, the camera should still try to identify me, especially since my head is in front of the camera and it should be able to at least detect the presence of a head, even if it can’t identify that it’s me.

The disappointing thing is that even when it does recognise me, it’s no quicker than me swiping up and entering my 4 digit PIN, and you look much less of an idiot doing it. I feel that the integration of a finger print reader would have been much better – less chance of you putting your finger in the wrong place and less environment factors to account for. Not to mention the technology is probably cheaper than the camera required to do Windows Hello with a camera.

This bring me to the final point of this post which is that I’ve bought a production device which comes with the RTM build of Windows 10 Mobile. Now of course, Windows is now a service, which means that patches and updates should come through progressively but at this point no updates have come out for regular customers. If you go to Settings and look at setting up Windows Hello, it is clearly marked as Beta…. WTF! Why have I got Beta features on a device I’ve paid a lot of money for? I don’t know when it became acceptable to ship Beta features to end customers but I think it traces back to Google (if you recall Google was in Beta for years before this tag was removed from their service). Beta testing is there for a purpose, to iron out bugs before you ship to end customers. Now that’s not to say that you can’t have some end customers as beta testers, but they should be invited/request to take part, rather than assume that every customer will tolerate unpolished, incomplete or broken features. Microsoft shipping Beta features to end customers just points to why Apple dominates the mobile market and why iOS customers rarely switch to other platforms.

Windows 10 Microsoft Developer Camp in Sydney and Melbourne

Microsoft Dev Camps are no cost, hands-on, technical training events for developers led by Microsoft experts.

Sydney 23rd February – Register

Melbourne 25th February – Register

Agenda

Time

Module title

Hands-on / theory / demo

8:30am – 9:15am

Registration and welcome

Theory

9:15am – 10:15am

Introduction to Windows 10 UWP

Theory + demo

10:15 am – 10:30am

Morning tea

10:30am – 11:30am

Adaptive UI

Theory + hands-on

11:30am – 12:00pm

Live tiles & notifications

Theory + demo

12:00pm – 1:00pm

Lunch

1:00pm – 2:00pm

Edge + hosted web apps

Theory + hands-on

2:00pm – 3:00pm

Cloud Services & connected experiences

Theory + hands-on

3:00pm – 3:30pm

Afternoon tea

3:30pm – 4:30pm

More personal computing

Theory + hands-on

4:30pm – 5:00pm

Store & monetisation

Theory + demo

5:00pm – 5:30pm

Wrap up

Theory

Microsoft Lumia 950, Windows Hello and Continuum

Due to an issue with the USB dock on my Lumia 640XL preventing me deploying apps for debugging, I went ahead and ordered a Lumia 950 XL which arrived today. The unboxing experience went well and as per most new phones there’s the normal down time whilst you transfer and reinstall apps on the new device. There were two features that I really wanted to try out:

Windows Hello

I’ve been using my Surface Book for a while now, so I’m used to the speed and convenience of the Windows Hello sign in experience which means I can just look at my monitor and it signs in. On the phone the experience is basically the same – it looks for you and signs you in. However, I do feel that it’s actually slower than simply tapping the pin code. At this stage I’ll leave Windows Hello enabled but I suspect that it may annoy me, more than it is a convenience.

Continuum

I don’t have one of the continuum docks yet, and since I purchased a grey-imported phone I wasn’t eligible for http://microsoftdisplaydock.com.au/, the Microsoft Australia offer for getting a free dock (personally I think this should be open to anyone willing to sync $700+ dollars into a Windows Phone at this point given the dire lack of feature complete apps). However, I do have a TV that has a Miracast dongle (https://www.microsoft.com/en-ie/mobile/accessory/hd-10/) attached to it, so I went ahead and tapped the NFC pad, and 10 seconds later the device was connected, displaying out my TV. The phone turns into a track pad and the whole TV is used for whichever app is being displayed.

I went and downloaded an app we’ve just helped deliver - https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/store/apps/hungry-jacks-shake-win-app/9nblggh648x0. Looks brilliant running at full desktop size on a TV screen.

Keeping Visual States in Sync with Application States using Adaptive Triggers and BuildIt.Lifecycle

In earlier posts on BuildIt.Lifecycle I’ve covered how changing state via the StateManager can trigger events that will cause changes in visual states on the corresponding page. With the Universal Windows Platform (UWP) we have visual state triggers which can be used to invoke state changes from within the view. For example an AdaptiveTrigger can cause a change in visual state based on the size of the window, which I covered in the post, Using the Universal Windows Platform SplitView Control with Visual States and BuildIt.Lifecycle. These two mechanisms of changing visual states are independent and thus would lead to an inconsistent experience when it comes to maintaining state. For example, if I update the AboutViewModel to include state definitions that modify a Data property, then when the state changes the value of Data will change between “Minimised” and “Expanded”

private string data;
public string Data
{
    get { return data; }
    set
    {
        data = value;
        OnPropertyChanged();
    }
}

public AboutViewModel()
{

    StateManager
        .Group<AboutExpandStates>()
        .DefineState(AboutExpandStates.Minimised)
            .Target(this)
                .Change(x => x.Data, (x, c) => x.Data = c)
                .ToValue("Minimised")
        .DefineState(AboutExpandStates.Expanded)
            .Target(this)
                .Change(x => x.Data, (x, c) => x.Data = c)
                .ToValue("Expanded");
}

If the application was to change state by invoking ChangeState on the StateManager, this would trigger the appropriate change in Visual State on the page. If the user were to resize the page, the AdaptiveTriggers would kick in, causing a change in the Visual State. However, this change wouldn’t be reflected in the StateManager, thus not updating the value of Data (ie would say “Minimised” when the SplitView was expanded, or saying “Expanded” when the SplitView was collapsed). Luckily the VisualStateGroup class in UWP raises a CurrentStateChanged event, which can be intercepted and used to route the update back in the StateManager. This has been added to BuildIt.Lifecycle to ensure consistence between the state of the StateManager and the corresponding visual states. In the same way as the name of each VisualState has to match the enumeration value, the name of the VisualStateGroup has to match the name of the enumeration itself.

Toggling the SplitView using Visual States

Yesterday when I was Toggling the SplitView Pane using a Hamburger Button in a UWP Application, I did it by simply inverting the IsPaneOpen property on the SplitView. This is in conflict with the visual states I had previously declared. An alternative would be for the button to invoke a state change on the AboutViewModel – this relies on knowing what the current state is, as shown in the following code which sits within the AboutViewModel.

public void ToggleSplitView()
{
    var group = StateManager.StateGroups[typeof (AboutExpandStates)] as StateGroup<AboutExpandStates>;
    var current = group.CurrentState;
    var current = StateManager.CurrentState<AboutExpandStates>();
    StateManager.GoToState(current != AboutExpandStates.Expanded
        ? AboutExpandStates.Expanded
        : AboutExpandStates.Minimised);
}

Update: There is now a CurrentState method on the StateManager which eliminates the need to explicitly grab a reference to the state group. See bold lines in code above for the change

Toggling the SplitView Pane using a Hamburger Button in a UWP Application

Yesterday (Using the Universal Windows Platform SplitView Control with Visual States and BuildIt.Lifecycle) I introduced a SplitView into my sample application where I used a couple of buttons in the content. In a lot of applications the SplitView will be triggered by either AdaptiveTriggers used in conjunection with the visual states, or via a hamburger button. Today I’ll add both of these to our application. Firstly a couple of AdaptiveTriggers added to the visual state definitions:

<VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>
    <VisualStateGroup x:Name="SplitViewStates">
        <VisualState x:Name="Minimised">
            <VisualState.StateTriggers>
                <AdaptiveTrigger MinWindowWidth="0" />
            </VisualState.StateTriggers>
        </VisualState>
        <VisualState x:Name="Expanded">
            <VisualState.Setters>
                <Setter Target="RootSplitView.(SplitView.IsPaneOpen)"
                        Value="True" />
                <Setter Target="RootSplitView.(SplitView.DisplayMode)"
                        Value="Inline" />
            </VisualState.Setters>
            <VisualState.StateTriggers>
                <AdaptiveTrigger MinWindowHeight="0" MinWindowWidth="600" />
            </VisualState.StateTriggers>
        </VisualState>
    </VisualStateGroup>
</VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>
As the user adjusts the width of the window the Pane of the SplitView will open and close depending on whether the window is wide enough. Secondly, I need to add a hamburger button to the layout of the page. This is a regualr button control, styled to be a hamburger button – in this case the style for the hamburger button was taken from the UWP samples.

<Button Style="{StaticResource SplitViewTogglePaneButtonStyle}"
        Click="splitViewToggle_Click" />

private void splitViewToggle_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    RootSplitView.IsPaneOpen = !RootSplitView.IsPaneOpen;
}


// -------------------------------------- Page Resources ------------------------------

<Page.Resources>
    <ControlTemplate x:Key="SplitViewTogglePaneButtonTemplate"
                        TargetType="Button">
        <Grid x:Name="RootGrid"
                Background="{TemplateBinding Background}">
            <VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>
                <VisualStateGroup x:Name="CommonStates">
                    <VisualState x:Name="Normal" />
                    <VisualState x:Name="PointerOver">
                        <VisualState.Setters>
                            <Setter Target="RootGrid.Background"
                                    Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlBackgroundBaseLowBrush}" />
                            <Setter Target="ContentPresenter.Foreground"
                                    Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlHighlightBaseMediumHighBrush}" />
                        </VisualState.Setters>
                    </VisualState>
                    <VisualState x:Name="Pressed">
                        <VisualState.Setters>
                            <Setter Target="RootGrid.Background"
                                    Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlBackgroundBaseMediumLowBrush}" />
                            <Setter Target="ContentPresenter.Foreground"
                                    Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlHighlightBaseMediumBrush}" />
                        </VisualState.Setters>
                    </VisualState>
                    <VisualState x:Name="Disabled">
                        <VisualState.Setters>
                            <Setter Target="ContentPresenter.Foreground"
                                    Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlForegroundBaseLowBrush}" />
                        </VisualState.Setters>
                    </VisualState>
                </VisualStateGroup>
            </VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>
            <ContentPresenter x:Name="ContentPresenter"
                                Padding="{TemplateBinding Padding}"
                                BorderBrush="{TemplateBinding BorderBrush}"
                                BorderThickness="{TemplateBinding BorderThickness}"
                                HorizontalContentAlignment="{TemplateBinding HorizontalContentAlignment}"
                                VerticalContentAlignment="{TemplateBinding VerticalContentAlignment}"
                                AutomationProperties.AccessibilityView="Raw"
                                ContentTemplate="{TemplateBinding ContentTemplate}"
                                ContentTransitions="{TemplateBinding ContentTransitions}" />
        </Grid>
    </ControlTemplate>
    <Style x:Key="SplitViewTogglePaneButtonStyle"
            TargetType="Button">
        <Setter Property="Background"
                Value="Transparent" />
        <Setter Property="Foreground"
                Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlForegroundBaseHighBrush}" />
        <Setter Property="BorderBrush"
                Value="{ThemeResource SystemControlForegroundBaseHighBrush}" />
        <Setter Property="BorderThickness"
                Value="0" />
        <Setter Property="Padding"
                Value="0" />
        <Setter Property="HorizontalAlignment"
                Value="Left" />
        <Setter Property="HorizontalContentAlignment"
                Value="Center" />
        <Setter Property="VerticalAlignment"
                Value="Top" />
        <Setter Property="VerticalContentAlignment"
                Value="Center" />
        <Setter Property="UseSystemFocusVisuals"
                Value="True" />
        <Setter Property="FontFamily"
                Value="{ThemeResource SymbolThemeFontFamily}" />
        <Setter Property="Content"
                Value="&#xE700;" />
        <Setter Property="Height"
                Value="48" />
        <Setter Property="Width"
                Value="48" />
        <Setter Property="FontWeight"
                Value="Normal" />
        <Setter Property="FontSize"
                Value="20" />
        <Setter Property="Template"
                Value="{StaticResource SplitViewTogglePaneButtonTemplate}" />
    </Style>
</Page.Resources>

Using the Universal Windows Platform SplitView Control with Visual States and BuildIt.Lifecycle

In this post I’m going to add a SplitView to the About page. I’ve also created two visual states that will control whether the Pane of the SplitView is visible or not (ie IsPaneOpen) and whether the display behaviour is for it to overlay or shift the content over (ie Inline). In the main content area I’ve also added two buttons which will be used to switch between each visual state. Lastly, in the SplitView.Pane has a Close button which will be used to return to the previous page in the application.

<Grid Background="{ThemeResource ApplicationPageBackgroundThemeBrush}">
       <VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>
           <VisualStateGroup x:Name="SplitViewStates">
               <VisualState x:Name="Minimised" />
               <VisualState x:Name="Expanded">
                   <VisualState.Setters>
                       <Setter Target="RootSplitView.(SplitView.IsPaneOpen)"
                               Value="True" />
                       <Setter Target="RootSplitView.(SplitView.DisplayMode)"
                               Value="Inline" />
                   </VisualState.Setters>
               </VisualState>
           </VisualStateGroup>
       </VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>

       <SplitView  x:Name="RootSplitView">
           <SplitView.Pane>
               <Grid>
                   <Border Background="Yellow" />
                   <Button Click="CloseClick">Close</Button>
               </Grid>
           </SplitView.Pane>

           <StackPanel VerticalAlignment="Center"
                       HorizontalAlignment="Center">
               <TextBlock Text="About Page"
                          FontSize="40" />
               <TextBlock Text="{Binding AboutTitle}"
                          FontSize="40" />
               <Button Click="ExpandClick">Expand</Button>
               <Button Click="CollapseClick">Collapse</Button>
           </StackPanel>
       </SplitView>
   </Grid>
And here is the code behind for the page:

private void ExpandClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    (DataContext as AboutViewModel).Expand();
}
private void CollapseClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    (DataContext as AboutViewModel).Collapse();
}

And then the implementation of the Expand and Collapse methods on the AboutViewModel. For this we’re defining states whose names match the visual states I declared in the XAML. The Expand and Collapse method then switch between these states. I’ve shown the whole class (excluding the AboutTitle property as I’ve changed the base class to include the StateManager and OnCompletion.

public class AboutViewModel : BaseStateManagerViewModelWithCompletion<DefaultCompletion>
{
    public AboutViewModel()
    {
        StateManager.Group<AboutExpandStates>().DefineAllStates();
    }

    public void Close()
    {
        OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete);
    }

    public void Expand()
    {
        StateManager.GoToState(AboutExpandStates.Expanded);
    }

    public void Collapse()
    {
        StateManager.GoToState(AboutExpandStates.Minimised);
    }
}

Lastly, I needed to modify the About state for the PrimaryRegion so that the Completion event would return the application to the Home state:

.StateWithViewModel<AppStates, AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About)
    .OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete).ChangeToPreviousState()

    .WhenChangedToWithData<AppStates, AboutViewModel, string>((vm, d) => vm.AboutTitle = d)
.EndState();

And here is the output with the state manager triggering changes that switch visual states expanding and collapsing the Pane of the SplitView.

image image

Additional Windows using Regions with BuildIt.Lifecycle

In the first post on Getting Started with BuildIt.Lifecycle I touched on the notion of an application region being a logical representation of a Window that’s part of an application. Most Windows Phone, iOS and Android applications will only have a single region but the very nature of Windows lends itself to multi-windowed applications. In this post we’ll extend the sample application to launch a new Window by creating a new region within the application. We’ll start with the declaration of the region:

public enum AdditionalStates
{
    Base,
    Landing
}

public class AdditionalRegion : StateAwareApplicationRegion
{

    public AdditionalRegion()
    {
        StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AdditionalStates>()
            .StateWithViewModel<AdditionalStates, LandingViewModel>(AdditionalStates.Landing)
                .OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete)
                .CloseRegion(this)
            .EndState();
    }

    protected override async Task CompleteStartup()
    {

        await base.CompleteStartup();

        await StateManager.GoToState(AdditionalStates.Landing, false);
    }
}

You may notice this is slightly different from the PrimaryRegion I defined in my initial post as it inherits from the StateAwareApplicationRegion instead of just ApplicationRegion, and that there’s no StateManager property. The StateAwareApplicationRegion was added as a convenience class, which contains the StateManager property and implements the IHasStates interface. Note that both regions in my sample application now inherit from this class.

There is only a single state defined for the AdditionalRegion, which will correlate to the only page that will get loaded. When this region is started, the state manager transitions to the Landing state, which will display the LandingPage. In order for this to work, we need to create and correlate a LandingPage to the Landing state. I’ve added a page to the application based on the Blank Page template, called LandingPage. In App.xaml.cs I then needed to add the association between the new page and the Landing state:

LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<LandingPage>().ForState(AdditionalStates.Landing);

On the MainPage of the application I’ve added another Button which simply calls a new OpenAnotherWindow method on the MainViewModel.

private void AnotherWindowClick(object sender, Windows.UI.Xaml.RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    ViewModel.OpenAnotherWindow();
}

The OpenAnotherWindow method simply calls OnComplete with a new enumeration value of AnotherWindow (this enumeration value is independent of the fact that I’ll be using it to open a new window, I could have called it “ShowMeTheMoney” so long as it correlates to the handler I’ll define in the PrimaryRegion).

public void OpenAnotherWindow()
{
    OnComplete(MainCompletion.AnotherWindow);
}

As I just mentioned, I need to define what happens when OnComplete is called. To do this I need to update the state declarations in the PrimaryRegion. Here you can see the additional OnComplete which handles the AnotherWindow enumeration value, and calls LaunchRegion.

StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
        .OnCompleteWithData(MainCompletion.Settings,vm=>vm.HelloWithTime)
        .ChangeState(AppStates.Settings)

        .OnCompleteWithData< AppStates, MainViewModel,MainCompletion,string>(MainCompletion.About,null)
        .ChangeState(AppStates.About)
                   
        .WhenChangedTo(async vm => await vm.LoadData())
                   
        .OnComplete(MainCompletion.AnotherWindow)
        .LaunchRegion(this,TypeHelper.Ref<AdditionalRegion>())
    .EndState()

Note: The TypeHelper is there to try to eliminate the need to specify all the Type arguments for the LaunchRegion method. I’ll look to refactor this more as we go to make it less obtuse to use.

That’s it, when you run the application, clicking the new Button will spawn of new windows (and actually will keep spawning new windows each time you click the button, even if the previous window is still open).

Refactoring Data Passing Methods in BuildIt.Lifecycle

In my earlier post, Passing Data Between States with BuildIt.Lifecycle, the state declarations for the primary application region started to look really messy. As promised I’ve tidied up the extension helper methods, making it much easier to define delegates that are invoked when changing to and from a state. The updated state declartion now looks like:

StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
        .OnCompleteWithData(MainCompletion.Settings,vm=>vm.HelloWithTime)
            .ChangeState(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnCompleteWithData< AppStates, MainViewModel,MainCompletion,string>(MainCompletion.About,null)
            .ChangeState(AppStates.About)
        .WhenChangedTo(async vm => await vm.LoadData())
    .EndState()
               
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, SettingsViewModel>(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete).ChangeToPreviousState()
        .WhenChangedToWithData<AppStates, SettingsViewModel, string>((vm, d) => vm.SettingsTitle = d)
    .EndState()
               
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About)
        .WhenChangedToWithData<AppStates, AboutViewModel, string>((vm, d) => vm.AboutTitle = d)
    .EndState();

Note that if you’re attempting to use these updates they haven’t yet made their way into the NuGet packages. I’ll endeavour to update these packages later this week. In the meantime I’d recommend downloading the source from the BuildIt repository on GitHub.

Loading Data Using Services with BuildIt.Lifecycle

The BuildIt.Lifecycle automatically creates instances of ViewModels and associates them with the corresponding page/view as the user steps between application states. Behind the scenes this uses Autofac to create these instances and ensure any dependencies are resolved. ViewModels that require access to device hardware, or to services that load or save data, can simply include the interface in the constructor. Take the following example where the MainViewModel relies on an instance of the IDataService interface to populate the Contacts collection.

public interface IDataService
{
    Task<IEnumerable<string>> LoadContacts();
}

public class MainViewModel : BaseViewModelWithCompletion<MainCompletion>
{
    public ObservableCollection<string> Contacts { get; }=new ObservableCollection<string>();
    private IDataService Data { get; }
    public MainViewModel(IDataService data)
    {
        Data = data;
    }
    public async Task LoadData()
    {
        var contactList = await Data.LoadContacts();
        contactList.DoForEach(Contacts.Add);
    }

We need to make two changes to our application declaration. The first is to register the implementation of IDataService, which we’ll do in App.xaml.cs

var core = new SimpleStatesApplication();
var wm = new WindowManager(core);
await core.Startup(builder =>
{
    builder.RegisterType<UWPDataService>().As<IDataService>();
});

public class UWPDataService : IDataService
{
    public async Task<IEnumerable<string>>  LoadContacts()
    {
        return new []{"Joe", "Bob", "Frank"};
    }
}

The other change is to then invoke this method when the MainViewModel is used, this is when the Home state is changed to. We add the following to our state declarations

(group.Item2.States[AppStates.Home] as IViewModelStateDefinition<AppStates, MainViewModel>)
    .WhenChangedTo(async vm => await vm.LoadData());

Note that we can also register services as part of our application class, allowing them to be registered within the PCL, rather than the platform specific libraries. This is useful for services that you want to use the same implementation for all supported platforms.

public class SimpleStatesApplication : RegionAwareBaseApplication<PrimaryRegion>
{
    protected override void RegisterDependencies(ContainerBuilder builder)
    {
        base.RegisterDependencies(builder);
        builder.RegisterType<BasicDebugLogger>().As<ILogService>();
    }
}

The ILogService is used within BuildIt.Lifecycle, so registering this implementatino will allow you to view the diagnostic information in the Output window within Visual Studio.

Passing Data Between States with BuildIt.Lifecycle

Yesterday I discussed in my post, Navigating Back using State History with BuildIt.Lifecycle, how we needed to extend the state manager concept to understand and track state history. The next challenge that app developers face, that doesn’t fit nicely into the current state manager concept is that you often need to pass data between pages of the application. Think of a simple example where you have a list of contacts on one page; the user taps on one of those contacts and is taken to a new page that shows the details of that person. What you need to pass between pages is information about which contact the user tapped. I’ll discuss later how we can pass data between states, and thus view models, later in the post, but first I wanted to dig into the concept of passing data between pages a bit further.

When the user tapped on the contact in the list, there is a lot of information that we can record about that event:

- Mouse/Touch position (don’t forget we’re not just dealing with mobile devices, apps are a big part of the desktop experience on Mac and PC now)

- List index (the index of the item tapped in the list)

- List item (the object in the list that corresponds to the cell that was tapped)

- Item Id (some sort of unique identifier of the item that was tapped)

With all these pieces of information, the question is which one to pass to the details page. Let’s review them individually:

- Mouse/Touch position – this in itself isn’t very useful as it only has meaning on the page that’s currently in view and that point in time. For example, if the user were to scroll the list, all of a sudden this information is useless as it now points to a different cell in the list

- List index – this is only useful if the details page has a reference to exactly the same list that is used to populate the contacts list page. If the underlying data set changed (eg sync with backend caused new contacts to be downloaded), then the list index might now point to a different item

- List item – if the items in the list contain all the details necessary to populate the details page then passing the list item to the details page is ok. However, if you have a large list off contacts, chances are you only load enough data about each contact to display the item in the list (eg perhaps only photo and name). In this case, passing the whole entity isn’t that useful since the details page has to load the whole contact anyhow. The other point worth considering is about serialization of navigation parameters – depending on the platform there are mechanisms for persisting navigation stack, including data parameters; some of these have size and complexity constraints on the data passed between pages.

- Item Id – this is probably the best choice for this scenario. It contains enough information for the contact to be loaded. If performance is a concern (ie you want the contact summary information to be instantly available when the user arrives at the details page, even if details have to be progressively loaded), then you should cache the contact summary information in memory in a service which can be accessed as soon as the details page is loaded. The cache service might also cache the last X number of loaded contacts in memory to make it quick for a user to go between contacts.

Ok, so this works for this scenario but how do we summarize this into a more generic form. Essentially it comes down to passing the minimal set of information between pages that is required to completely load the next page. Ideally pages (and their corresponding ViewModel) should be self sufficient, relying only on application services to load data. Application services, most likely passed into the ViewModel using some sort of dependency injection, provide an abstraction over loading/saving data both locally (in memory and to disk) and across the network (calling services or performing data sync). To this end, by supplying the minimum set of information (eg item id in the case of the contacts list scenario), the ViewModel is only reliant on that piece of information. This reduces the necessary testing surface area as there are few permutations of input data that need to be teted.

Now that we have an understanding of how to determine what data to pass between pages, we again need to come back to thinking in terms of states and passing data during a transition between states. If you recall, our ViewModels aren’t aware of states or the ability to change between them. All they’re able to do is indicate that they’re complete. In the following code, the MainViewModel exposes a public HelloWithTime property as well as a private AboutWithTime property, the former will be passed into the Settings state, the latter into the About state. You’ll observe that the OnComplete call for settings hasn’t been changed, whilst there is now a call to OnCompleteWithData, passing in the AboutWithTime property value, for completing with the About completion value.

public class MainViewModel : BaseViewModelWithCompletion<MainCompletion>
{
    public string HelloWithTime => $"Hello World at {DateTime.Now.ToString("h:mm tt")}";
    private string AboutWithTime => $"About information {DateTime.Now.ToString("h:mm tt")}";

    public void DisplaySettings()
    {
        OnComplete(MainCompletion.Settings);
    }
    public void DisplayAbout()
    {
        OnCompleteWithData(MainCompletion.About,AboutWithTime);
    }
}

Our state declaration now looks like the following:

var group = StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
        .OnCompleteWithData(MainCompletion.Settings,vm=>vm.HelloWithTime)
            .ChangeState(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnCompleteWithData< AppStates, MainViewModel,MainCompletion,string>(MainCompletion.About,null)
            .ChangeState(AppStates.About)
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, SettingsViewModel>(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete).ChangeToPreviousState()
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About)
        .EndState();

(group.Item2.States[AppStates.Settings] as IViewModelStateDefinition<AppStates, SettingsViewModel>)
    .WhenChangedToWithData<AppStates, SettingsViewModel, string>((vm, d) => vm.SettingsTitle = d);

(group.Item2.States[AppStates.About] as IViewModelStateDefinition<AppStates, AboutViewModel>)
    .WhenChangedToWithData<AppStates, AboutViewModel, string>((vm, d) => vm.AboutTitle = d);

What’s interesting here is that there are two parts to passing data between states. The first is how the data is exposed out of the state that’s being completed. Here I’ve shown two ways – completion with Settings uses the public HelloWithTime property to retrieve the data to pass to the next state; completion with About can’t access the AboutWithTime property, since it’s private, which is why it relies on the MainViewModel to pass out the AboutWithTime value when it invokes OnCompleteWithData. Note that currently in the state declaration you still need to call OnCompleteWithData passing in a null value for the data accessor, otherwise the data value isn’t passed – this will be fixed shortly.

The second part of passing data between states is how the data is passed into the new state. This is done by calling the WhenChangedToWithData and specifying a function that will be invoked with the corresponding data. Note this method is a generic method and you can actually call it multiple times with different data types, which means that you can handle arriving at this state with different data (perhaps from different states). One thing to be aware of is that behind the scenes the data is being serialized to json, so whatever data you pass between states need to be serializable to json. Ideally the data being passed between states should be kept to a minimum.

Navigating Back using State History with BuildIt.Lifecycle

So far I’ve only discussed transitioning between states with an assumption that every transition is forward looking and that our state manager doesn’t track any sort of history. Other than simple applications, or poorly architected applications that don’t make use of the devices back navigation feature, it is a requirement for most applications to track the page/view/state that the user was previously in, allowing them to easily navigate back to where they just came from. This doesn’t fit into the normal concept of a finite state machine, since this wouldn’t normally have any “memory”. However, our state manager can easily be extended to include a history of which states have been visited.

Again, let’s start with updating the user interface on our simple application. On the settings page we didn’t have any way to get back to the main/home page of our application. I’ll add a new button, resulting in the following XAML and codebehind:

<Page x:Class="SimpleStates.Pages.SettingsPage"
      xmlns="
http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
      xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
      xmlns:local="using:SimpleStates.Pages"
      xmlns:d="
http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/blend/2008"
      xmlns:mc="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006"
      mc:Ignorable="d">
    <StackPanel Background="{ThemeResource ApplicationPageBackgroundThemeBrush}">
        <TextBlock Text="Settings Page"
                   VerticalAlignment="Center"
                   HorizontalAlignment="Center"
                   FontSize="40" />
        <Button Click="GoBackClick">Go Back</Button>
    </StackPanel>
</Page>

public sealed partial class SettingsPage
{
    public SettingsPage()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
    }
    private void GoBackClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
    {
        (DataContext as SettingsViewModel).Complete();
    }
}

The only change I needed to make to the SettingsViewModel is to change the back class. Note that in this case since there is only one way that the state can be exited, I’m going to use the built in DefaultCompletion enumeration, which has a single Complete value.

public class SettingsViewModel : BaseViewModelWithCompletion<DefaultCompletion>
{
    public void Complete()
    {
        OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete);
    }
}

The only thing left to do is to update the state declaration for my application to change to the previous state when the Settings state is Complete, as follows:

StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
        .OnComplete(MainCompletion.Settings).ChangeState(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnComplete(MainCompletion.About).ChangeState(AppStates.About)
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, SettingsViewModel>(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnComplete(DefaultCompletion.Complete).ChangeToPreviousState()
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About);

The state history feature does allow for skipping states that are in the history, so you can easily return to the start of an application by changing to the corresponding state using ChangeBackToState instead of ChangeState.

Note: The state history feature can be turned on/off on individual state groups. By default TrackHistory is disabled for regular state groups. State groups that have corresponding view models has TrackHistory enabled by default.

Declarative Navigation using BuildIt.Lifecycle

Yesterday I showed in the post, Navigation using BuildIt.Lifecycle, that by wiring up to events in the HomeViewModel, the PrimaryRegion could then change the application state, thereby causing a navigation to the corresponding page. Since this pattern is likely to be so common I felt there was an opportunity to refactor it. In this post I’ll show a couple of ways that we can now re-write this code.

The first is just a refactoring of what we did yesterday. There are now OnEvent and ChangeState extension methods that allow for a declarative way to say that when an event occurs on the ViewModel, it should correspond to a change in state. You will notice that the method for declaring the state has changed from DefineViewModelState to StateWithViewModel, and that we now have an EndState method to conclude the state declaration. This is all in aid of trying to improve the fluid usage of this library and we’re likely to see a number of iterations of this before it settles, so apologies if this causes you to rework your code.

StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
        .OnEvent((vm, a) => vm.ShowSettings += a,
            (vm, a) => vm.ShowSettings -= a)
        .ChangeState(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnEvent((vm, a) => vm.ShowAbout += a,
            (vm, a) => vm.ShowAbout -= a)
        .ChangeState(AppStates.About)
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, SettingsViewModel>(AppStates.Settings)
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About);

This refactoring was all very good except it still required events to be declared in the ViewModel, including invoking methods etc. I suspect that the most common use of this pattern will be for a single event to be declared which includes an enumeration indicating what type of “completion” the ViewModel. For example in this case we’d have an enumeration which includes Settings and About values, and depending on which value is included in the event, we’d choose to change to the corresponding state (in theory you could use the same enumeration that is used to define the states (ie AppStates) but I would avoid this as it could get confusing as there would be an implied link, rather than explicit declaration of intent).

Rather than every developer having to implement this pattern, we can simply change our MainViewModel to inherit from BaseViewModelWithCompletion and declaring an enumeration, MainCompletion:

public enum MainCompletion
{
    Base,
    Settings,
    About
}

public class MainViewModel:BaseViewModelWithCompletion<MainCompletion>
{
    public void DisplaySettings()
    {
        OnComplete(MainCompletion.Settings);
    }
    public void DisplayAbout()
    {
        OnComplete(MainCompletion.About);
    }
}

With this change in place, we can simplify our state declarations further to:

StateManager.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
        .OnComplete(MainCompletion.Settings).ChangeState(AppStates.Settings)
        .OnComplete(MainCompletion.About).ChangeState(AppStates.About)
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, SettingsViewModel>(AppStates.Settings)
        .EndState()
    .StateWithViewModel<AppStates, AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About);

What’s really interesting now is that we’ve got a very declarative way to define what the navigation is within our application. We have events that trigger changes between states. This is very similar to what you’d expect if you were looking at a diagram of a finite state machine where you have states, and triggers that cause changes between states. The logical extension of this would be to have some kind of dsl that could be used to describe this in some form of XML, making it possible to build a designer around it!

Navigation using BuildIt.Lifecycle

In my post, Getting Started with BuildIt.Lifecycle, I showed how to get started with BuildIt.Lifecycle. The next step is to add basic navigation between pages/views. To do this, we need to change our mindset to again think of this as a state transition. Before I cover what I mean by this, let’s add two buttons to our Home page that we’ll use to trigger the navigation to either the Settings or About pages.

<StackPanel VerticalAlignment="Center"
            HorizontalAlignment="Center">
    <TextBlock Text="Main Page" FontSize="40" />
    <Button Click="SettingsClick">Settings</Button>
    <Button Click="AboutClick">About</Button>
</StackPanel>

As you can see from the XAML there are event handlers wired up to the Click event on each of the Buttons. In each of the event handlers we simply route a call to a corresponding method on the ViewModel.

private MainViewModel ViewModel => DataContext as MainViewModel;

private void SettingsClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    ViewModel.DisplaySettings();
}

private void AboutClick(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
    ViewModel.DisplayAbout();
}

Now we need to think about what displaying either the Settings or the About page means in the context of our application state. When the application is launched the PrimaryRegion transitions to the AppStates.Home state, which correlates to the HomePage being displayed. When the user clicks on either button, what we want the application to do is to transition from the Home state to the either the Settings or About state, depending on which button the user clicks.

Unlike some other frameworks where you can navigate from one ViewModel to another ViewModel by calling a base method such as ShowViewModel or call Navigate on some sort of Navigation wrapper, the HomeViewModel doesn’t actually know anything about the states of region (this is the responsibility of the StateManager that’s part of the PrimaryRegion). Instead, what the HomeViewModel has to do is to raise an event signalling that an event has occurred that it needs assistance dealing with. So the implementation for DisplaySettings and DisplayAbout becomes:

public event EventHandler ShowSettings;
public event EventHandler ShowAbout;
public void DisplaySettings()
{
    ShowSettings.SafeRaise(this);
}
public void DisplayAbout()
{
    ShowAbout.SafeRaise(this);
}

Note: SafeRaise is a helper method defined in BuildIt.General but with the new features in C# 6 you could also write this as:

ShowAbout?.Invoke(this,EventArgs.Empty);

With the HomeViewModel raising these events, we need to subscribe to them somewhere so that the PrimaryRegion can trigger the state change on its StateManager to go to either the Settings or About states. This is done by wiring and unwiring event handlers as part of the state transitions into and from the Home state:

sm.DefineViewModelState<MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home)
    .WhenChangedTo(vm =>
    {
        vm.ShowSettings += ChangeToSettings;
        vm.ShowAbout += ChangeToAbout;
    })
    .WhenChangingFrom(vm =>
    {
        vm.ShowSettings -= ChangeToSettings;
        vm.ShowAbout -= ChangeToAbout;
    });

And then it’s just a matter of implementing the ChangeToSettings and ChangeToAbout methods which just need to invoke a state change on the StateManager.

private async void ChangeToAbout(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    await StateManager.GoToState(AppStates.About);
}

private async void ChangeToSettings(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    await StateManager.GoToState(AppStates.Settings);
}

And we’re done; now when the user clicks on either the Settings or the About buttons, the PrimaryRegion will trigger the state change, which will in turn navigate to the corresponding page.

Getting Started with BuildIt.Lifecycle

Towards the end of last year I started playing with the concept of using states to manage more than just visual states on a page. States are already used to manage the internal states of a control (eg Pressed state of a button). If you think about the pages that make up an application, they also represent, at some level, the states of an application. As I discussed in my post, States v’s Regions for Multi-Window Applications, there is also a need for regions to accommodate for platforms where there are multiple windows and/or secondary screens. In this post I’m going to show how to get started with an incubatory framework that uses states as the primary mechanism to determine navigation.

We’re going to start with a UWP application based on the Blank App (Universal Windows) new project template.

image

Next, we’ll add a Core library based on the Class Library (Portable for iOS, Android and Windows) new project template.

image

Before writing code, I’ll add a NuGet reference to BuildIt.Lifecycle to the both projects, and then an additional reference to BuildIt.Lifecycle.UWP package to the UWP project. I’ll also add a reference to the SimpleStates.Core PCL project to the SimpleStates UWP project.

To get started I’m just going to wire up three pages, Home, Settings and About. Note that the BuildIt.Lifecycle library uses the term View in place of Page, to be more consistent with the non-XAML platforms. For this reason I often interchange between them. More importantly though, we need to step back and put these pages into the context of states within the app. Once the app has launched it will transition to the Home state. From there the user can transition the app to either the Settings or the About state. The user must then return to the Home state before going to a different state. If you feel overly enthusiastic you could actually create a state diagram that represents this. I’ll represent this using an enum to define what the state values are.

public enum AppStates
{
    Base,
    Home,
    Settings,
    About
}

Each state is to be associated with both a Page and a corresponding ViewModel. To this end, I’ll create three pages, HomePage, SettingsPage and AboutPage in the UWP project, and I’ll create three ViewModels, HomeViewModel, SettingsViewModel and AboutViewModel in the PCL. The association between the AppStates enumeration values and their corresponding ViewModel will be done in a minute when I use an instance of the StateManager to define the states of the application. Some frameworks, like MvvmCross, rely on a convention to associate the page with the viewmodel (and implicitly the state of the application). To avoid reflection, this framework requires manual association between the page and the corresponding state. So I need to add the following calls to the beginning of the constructor in the App.xaml.cs file.

public App()
{
    LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<Pages.MainPage>().ForState(AppStates.Home);
    LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<SettingsPage>().ForState(AppStates.Settings);
    LifecycleHelper.RegisterView<AboutPage>().ForState(AppStates.About);
As I mentioned I need to create an instance of the StateManager which will track the states of the application, including what the current state is (ie what page is currently being displayed). In order to do this I need an entity that holds the instance of the StateManager, and will effectively manage the current state of the main window of the application.

public class PrimaryRegion : ApplicationRegion, IHasStates
{
    public IStateManager StateManager { get; }


    public PrimaryRegion()
    {
        var ssm = new StateManager();
        var sm = ssm.GroupWithViewModels<AppStates>().Item2;
        sm.DefineViewModelState<MainViewModel>(AppStates.Home);
        sm.DefineViewModelState<SettingsViewModel>(AppStates.Settings);
        sm.DefineViewModelState<AboutViewModel>(AppStates.About);
        StateManager = ssm;
    }
}

You’ll notice that I refer to this as a region. This is because this framework understands about application regions, such as multiple windows, and whilst it’s not a topic for this post, it allows you to be able to manage those windows. What we do need to do is create a region manager that knows about the PrimaryRegion class, and in fact will set that region to be the default region:

public class SimpleStatesApplication : RegionAwareBaseApplication<PrimaryRegion>
{
    protected override void DefineApplicationRegions()
    {
        // We don't need to do anything as the PrimaryRegion automatically gets defined
        // use "RegionManager.DefineRegion<AnotherRegion>();" to register other regions
    }
}

The primary region needs to override the CompleteStartup task to force an initial transition to the Home state.

protected override async Task CompleteStartup()
{

    await base.CompleteStartup();

    await StateManager.GoToState(AppStates.Home, false);
}

This application can now be run and the Home page will be presented, and actually will have the corresponding MainViewModel set as its DataContext. In the next post I’ll discuss navigating between pages (ie transitioning to different states).

Connecting Universal Windows Platform Visual States to the StateManager

In my post State Management using BuildIt.States I made changes to elements on the page in a Universal Windows Platform (UWP) application using a StateManager. This was done to demonstrate the StateManager and this would work on any platform. However, for XAML platforms, this would normally be done via visual states. The following would describe the same states and corresponding changes to the UI.

<VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>
    <VisualStateGroup x:Name="MainStatesGroup">
        <VisualState x:Name="StateOne">
            <VisualState.Setters>
                <Setter Target="HelloTextBlock.(TextBlock.Text)" Value="State One" />
            </VisualState.Setters>
        </VisualState>
        <VisualState x:Name="StateTwo">
            <VisualState.Setters>
                <Setter Target="HelloTextBlock.(TextBlock.Text)" Value="State Two" />
            </VisualState.Setters>
        </VisualState>
        <VisualState x:Name="StateThree">
            <VisualState.Setters>
                <Setter Target="HelloTextBlock.(TextBlock.Text)" Value="State Three" />
            </VisualState.Setters>
        </VisualState>
        <VisualState x:Name="StateFour">
            <VisualState.Setters>
                <Setter Target="HelloTextBlock.(TextBlock.Text)" Value="State Four" />
            </VisualState.Setters>
        </VisualState>
    </VisualStateGroup>
</VisualStateManager.VisualStateGroups>

Connecting the ViewModel StateManager (which I setup in the post BuildIt.States from a ViewModel) to the visual states can be done using the VisualStateChanger class that exists in the BuildIt.Lifecycle.UWP library (https://www.nuget.org/packages/BuildIt.Lifecycle.UWP/). Again, this code is a little unrefined – I’ll be making changes to make it easier to connect up the VisualStateChanger without having to retrieve the StageGroup instance.

private VisualStateChanger<MainStates> Changer { get; set; }
protected override void OnNavigatedTo(NavigationEventArgs e)
{
    base.OnNavigatedTo(e);

    var sm = ViewModel.StateManager;
    var grp = sm.StateGroups[typeof(MainStates)] as StateGroup<MainStates, DefaultTransition>;
    Changer = new VisualStateChanger<MainStates>(this, grp);
}

Refactoring StateManager to StateManager Binding

In my previous post, BuildIt.States from a ViewModel, I showed a rather messy way to connect on StateManager to another. I’m just in the process of refactoring BuildIt.States to include an extra method on the IStateManager interface to enable simple binding between two StateManagers, and their respective StateGroups. This would significantly simplify the code necessary, as well as ensuring all StateGroups within the two StateManagers are synchronized.

private IStateBinder Binder { get; set; }
protected override void OnNavigatedTo(NavigationEventArgs e)
{
    base.OnNavigatedTo(e);

    Binder = manager.Bind(ViewModel.StateManager);
}
protected override void OnNavigatingFrom(NavigatingCancelEventArgs e)
{
    base.OnNavigatingFrom(e);

    Binder?.Unbind();
    Binder = null;
}
I’ll be updating the BuildIt.States NuGet package in the coming days to include this additional method.